CHURCH

Benedict XVI's letter: why now?

Many of our readers have asked us about La Bussola’s publication of a book containing Benedict XVI's letter reiterating the fullness of his renunciation of the papacy. The question is, why has it been published after 11 years? The answer lies in the new historical phase that has begun within the Church.

Ecclesia 09_08_2025 Italiano Español

The publication of Benedict XVI's letter to Monsignor Nicola Bux, dated 21 August 2014, in which he reaffirms the full validity of his resignation from the papacy, has attracted considerable interest and raised questions.

We will not address the comments of those who are now prisoners of convictions that have more to do with sectarian logic than adherence to the Catholic faith. Nor will we address the comments of those who, to paraphrase the judgement of 'Father Abraham' in the parable of the rich man, would not be 'persuaded even if someone rose from the dead'.

Instead, let us turn to a legitimate question that our readers have asked us: Why publish this letter after 11 years, rather than when the controversy was still ongoing? Firstly, because it was 'private correspondence' and Monsignor Bux wanted to keep it that way. But above all, he wanted to avoid the letter becoming further fuel for the war between opposing factions over Benedict XVI's resignation and Francis's pontificate. The disorderly and surreal reactions of those who have prospered on bizarre theories about Benedict XVI's resignation in recent years justify Monsignor Bux's decision.

Why publish it now? Monsignor Bux explains this in the introduction to the correspondence contained in the appendix to the book Realtà e utopia nella Chiesa (ed. Omni Die): 'Because, with the death of Pope Francis and the election of Pope Leo XIV, he considers the emotional phase opened by Benedict XVI's resignation to be over.'

Therefore, the publication of Benedict XVI's letter not only puts an end to much speculation, but also entrusts that resignation to history alongside all the critical assessments that can be made today. In order to fully understand its meaning, it should be remembered that the letter must be read in the context of the questions that Monsignor Bux gave to the Pope Emeritus during an audience on 21 July 2014. At the end of the hour-long conversation, which covered topics including liturgy, the interpretation of Vatican II, and Christian unity, Monsignor Bux gave Benedict XVI a letter, which is also included in the book. Written just over a year after his resignation, it contained the reflections and observations of many authoritative friends on his decision and its aftermath.

The replies written by Benedict XVI a month later are now handed over to history and are open to critical evaluation. In the appendix to the book, Monsignor Bux offers his assessment of the Pope's letter, which only partially answers the questions he was asked concerning the Petrine ministry and the consequences of Benedict XVI's resignation.

The book, of which the correspondence constitutes the appendix, offers an original interpretation of the last sixty years of Church history, providing a backdrop to the story of the renunciation of the papacy by offering a comparison between John Paul II and Benedict XVI on the one hand, and Francis and Monsignor Tonino Bello on the other.

Therefore, if read without prejudice, the book written in Italian provides an opportunity for reflection and deeper understanding, which may stimulate further evaluation.



EXCLUSIVE

The unpublished letter from Benedict XVI: 'My resignation is complete and valid'

07_08_2025 Riccardo Cascioli

The letter, written by the Pope Emeritus in August 2014 in response to objections regarding the validity and appropriateness of his resignation, is published for the first time in a book by Monsignor Nicola Bux (Realtà e utopia nella Chiesa [Reality and Utopia in the Church]), to whom it was addressed. This exceptional historical document should put an end to much sterile speculation.

CANON LAW

Benedict XVI renouncement was authentic not faked as some claim

31_10_2024 Luisella Scrosati

A study by two canonists, produced for Compass, analyzes the recurring arguments (including slips) pitched against the validity of Pope Ratzinger's resignation and thus the subsequent election of Francis.
-The full text of the document, by Geraldina Boni and Manuel Ganarin

THE FULL TEXT OF THE DOCUMENT

More on the alleged invalidity of Benedict XVI's Declaratio. Et de hoc satis

31_10_2024 Geraldina Boni*

Nihil sub sole novum. This is how one could summarize the feeling aroused by reading the thirty-seven-page pamphlet, entitled I Will Not Deliver the Lion. The case of Benedict XVI's Declaratio.