Italian Medicines Agency rewrites history admitting 'Covid 19 Vaccines don’t stop contagion'

Surprising new confirmation has emerged that the Italian health authorities were perfectly aware that the Covid 19 vaccines did not prevent the transmission of the virus. A confirmation that definitively sabotages the axiom passed off as a dogma by Prime minister Mario Draghi, 'if you don't get vaccinated, you’ll die'.

This latest admission, in order of time, arrived in recent days in the form of the reply that Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) gave to the Arbitrium association.

"No approved Covid-19 vaccine claims the 'prevention of transmission of infection by the Sars agent cov-2'". The statement is contained in the 8 pages with which Italian Medicines Agency director Carla Cantelmo responded to the request for access to administrative acts (FOIA) submitted on 20 June by the Arbitrium-pronto soccorso giuridico association chaired by lawyers Valeria Panetta and Manola Bozzelli.
Arbitrium PSG had also sent the request to the Italian Nation Health (ISS) Institute and the Italian Ministry of Health.

'But while the Ministry,' lawyer Panetta explained to the Daily Compass, 'replied that they had no documentation and the INH bounced us to the Italian Medicines Agency, the response from the Italian Medicines Agency is the one that left us most disoriented’.

In the nine questions submitted, the last one concerned the therapeutic indications of the Covid vaccines, and was structured as follows: 'You are asked to indicate which medicinal speciality has been authorised in Italy with the specific indication "prevention of the transmission of infection by the SARS agent cov-2"'.
After more than a month, Italian Medicines Agency response startled the authors of the request: 'No approved Covid-19 vaccine has the indication 'prevention of transmission of infection by the Sars agent cov-2''.

"The answer left us stunned in a positive sense, 'Panetta continued, 'the Italian Medicines Agency could not hide what was known and what the manufacturers had already said, namely that vaccines cannot prevent anything.

Why is the answer in some ways so sensational? "Because it opens up many political and judicial scenarios, confirming that the reference legislation on Covid was based on assumptions that proved to be false. In the law 44/2021 in fact, the first decree that instituted compulsory vaccination for doctors and health workers, it was clearly written that vaccination was made compulsory to prevent Sars Cov 2 infection, not Covid 19 disease'.

Article 4 of that much-discussed and revolutionary law reads: 'Urgent provisions on the prevention of contagion from Sars-CoV-2 through the provision of vaccination obligations for health professionals and health care workers' and a little further on: 'are obliged (health care workers ed.) to undergo free vaccination for the prevention of infection from Sars-CoV-2. The vaccination is an essential requirement for the exercise of the profession and for the performance of the work services carried out by the obliged parties'.

Panetta's reply was lapidary: 'This means that the state has obliged the administration of a product that had no function for its ratio legis'.

Even the legislation on the green pass is definitively undermined by this response, which shatters the narrative that it was essential to be vaccinated to protect oneself and others, not to infect the fragile, to be sure of being in contact with subjects who are not carriers of the virus.

In short, a great lie was constructed to force Italians to be inoculated: the illusion - later revealed to be fallacious in practice - that the vaccine would protect them from Covid 19 and its transmission. Well: the health authorities knew this, but acted to impose a different reading of the facts.

The Italian Medicines Agency’s admission is not, however, the discovery of the wheel, but only a further certification of disconcerting evidence and admissions that have emerged over the years, precisely on the fallacy of vaccines in order to protect against the virus: from the admissions of pharmaceutical companies - the particularly famous confession by Janine Small of Pfizer to the European Parliament - to the EMA (European Medicines Agency) reports. And it may be very useful material for the newly formed Italian joint Parliamentary covid commission that will begin its work in September.

It must be said that this is not the first time that the Italian Medicines Agency has admitted that the vaccine does not stop contagion: the same medicines agency had stated so in the frequently asked questions (FAQ) published on 4 August 2021 on its official website - thus well after the date of its official publication 44/2021 - that 'the vaccines currently in emergency use do not prevent the transmissibility and circulation of the virus, but only the Covid-19 disease caused by the Sars Cov-2 virus'. This answer is nothing more than one more piece of the lie behind the legislation with which Italians, starting with doctors, have been held in check.

What practical use does this information, two years after the end of the pandemic, have now? "First of all, the Ministry can no longer say that it has no documentation, but above all, it is clear that an important issue is at stake: the repeal of Decree 44/2021, which still exists and has the force of law, even though it was scheduled to expire on 31 December 2022."

Why then does it need to be repealed? "Because they are talking again about an increase in covid cases and they might not hesitate to take it out of the drawer to impose vaccinations on health workers and then force them on the whole population'."